[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Publishing Policies::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 6, Issue 4 (June-July 2017) ::
JHPM 2017, 6(4): 34-41 Back to browse issues page
Evaluation and Ranking of Service Quality in Four Public Hospitals in Iran using “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods”
Mohamad Ali Beheshtinia , Ahmad Torkzad
Faculty of Engineering, University of Semnan, Semnan, Iran , beheshtinia@semnan.ac.ir
Abstract:   (7074 Views)
Introduction: Improving the quality of services in hospitals and dealing with the health of people are very important. The aim of the present study is to evaluate and rank the quality of service in four public hospitals in Iran through “Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods” in 2016.
Methods: In this descriptive study, a sample of 8 faculty members from both Semnan University and Isfahan University of Medical Science and a random sample of 384 patients from four public hospitals in Isfahan are calculated by using Cochran method with 0.05 error. Two “Pairwise Comparison Questionnaire” and “Decision Matrix Questionnaire” are used to weight the identified criteria and determine the score of each hospital in each criterion, respectively. Cronbach's alpha of the first questionnaire is approved by 10 experts and the second questionnaire by patients. The hospitals are ranked, using two combined methods: 1- Analytical Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS, named AHP-TOPSIS, and 2- Modified Digital Logic and TOPSIS, named MDL-TOPSIS. Data is analyzed by Expert Choice. 11.
Results: Based on considered error level of 5%, results of both AHP-TOPSIS and MDL-TOPSIS methods, with closeness index values of 0.893 and 0.873 indicated that Al Zahra hospital provides the best quality of services.
Conclusions: The Al Zahra hospital has acceptable performance rather than other hospitals. It is suggested that MDL-TOPSIS and AHP-TOPSIS methods be applied to all hospitals in the country in order to identify the strengths and weaknesses so that hospitals recognize their overall status among the other hospitals compared.

 
Keywords: Hospital Administration, Decision-Making, Decision Support Techniques, Policy Making
Full-Text [PDF 585 kb]   (2509 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: health management
Received: 2016/09/24 | Accepted: 2017/09/13 | Published: 2017/09/13
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Beheshtinia M A, Torkzad A. Evaluation and Ranking of Service Quality in Four Public Hospitals in Iran using “Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methods”. JHPM 2017; 6 (4) :34-41
URL: http://jhpm.ir/article-1-696-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 6, Issue 4 (June-July 2017) Back to browse issues page
مدیریت ارتقای سلامت  Journal of Health Promotion Management
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660