Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran , Mostafaaskarian@yahoo.com
Abstract: (3632 Views)
Introduction: Evaluation in any organization is an essential part of maintaining and sustaining the organization. The purpose of this study was to determine the evaluation criteria of faculty members' performance.
Methods: The present study was conducted using qualitative content analysis method, in which 20 faculty members, specialized in educational management and evaluation and university departments managers were selected for semi-structured interviews. Sampling was purposive and snowball method. The robustness of the data was confirmed by participants and external controls. Data were analyzed using content analysis approach.
Resluts: Interview data consisted of 6 main themes and 21 sub-themes. The main themes include: research activity (3 sub-themes), educational activities (3 sub-themes), executive services (2 sub-themes), development (4 sub-themes), professional ethics (3 sub-themes) and ethics individual was (6 sub-themes).
Conclusiosn: The findings showed an in-depth understanding of faculty performance criteria in 6 main themes and 21 sub-themes. It is suggested that the findings of the present study be used to evaluate the performance of university lecturers.
Raoufi Kelachayeh S S, Askaryan M, Hamidifar F, Rezazadeh Bahadoran H. Explaining Performance Evaluation Criteria for University Faculty Members: A Qualitative Study. JHPM 2020; 9 (3) :72-83 URL: http://jhpm.ir/article-1-1159-en.html