[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Publishing Policies::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 5, Issue 1 (winter 2015) ::
JHPM 2015, 5(1): 50-61 Back to browse issues page
Determination of accreditation measures with clinical governance orientation using “Balanced Scorecard” Approach: A case study of Sarem Women’s Hospital
A Kazemi , S Shokohyar , M Azimian
Faculty of Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damavand, Tehran, Iran. , mahsa_azimian@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (9621 Views)
Introduction: In recent years, health authorities have implemented various methods to improve the quality of services and safety of patients. The aim of this study was to determine accreditation measures with clinical governance orientation using “Balanced Score card” Approach in Sarem Women’s Hospital. Material & Methods: In this descriptive study, 80 staff of Sarem Hospital were selected through a random sampling. To collect data, the “Balanced Scorecard” and “Clinical Governance” questionnaires were used. The content validity of the questionnaires was confirmed by 10 experts from medical staff, accreditation experts, and senior managers. In order to test the questionnaires’ reliability, 20 participants from clinical and non-clinical staff and experts in Sarem hospital were responded to pilot questionnaire that achieved satisfactory Cronbach's Alpha. To analyze the data, SPSS/22 and excel were used. Findings: 54 indicators for accreditation measures with clinical governance orientation were determined. Also according to the Pierson correlation test, the results showed that “clinical audit” indicators and “financial” perspective, “patient and community participation” indicators and “customer” perspective, “clinical effectiveness” indicators and “internal process” perspective, and finally “use of information and development” and “training and staff management” indicators and “growth and learning” perspective are correlated. However, “appropriateness of the risk management” indicators and “customer perspective” was not correlated. Conclusion: In this study, 54 accreditation indicators with clinical governance orientation were identified. Relationship between clinical governance indicators and Balanced Scorecard perspectives contributes to reduction of the complexity of hospital accreditation concepts. It is recommended that hospital administrators use the indicators to facilitate implementation of accreditation.
Keywords: Accreditation, Clinical governance, Balanced Scorecard.
Full-Text [PDF 497 kb]   (3189 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: nursing management & administration
Received: 2015/11/15 | Accepted: 2015/11/21 | Published: 2015/11/21
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kazemi A, Shokohyar S, Azimian M. Determination of accreditation measures with clinical governance orientation using “Balanced Scorecard” Approach: A case study of Sarem Women’s Hospital. JHPM 2015; 5 (1) :50-61
URL: http://jhpm.ir/article-1-545-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 1 (winter 2015) Back to browse issues page
مدیریت ارتقای سلامت  Journal of Health Promotion Management
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645