:: Volume 9, Issue 3 (May- June 2020) ::
JHPM 2020, 9(3): 72-83 Back to browse issues page
Explaining Performance Evaluation Criteria for University Faculty Members: A Qualitative Study
Seyedeh Susan Raoufi Kelachayeh , Mostafa Askaryan , Fatemeh Hamidifar , Hamidreza Rezazadeh Bahadoran
Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran , Mostafaaskarian@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (3315 Views)
Introduction: Evaluation in any organization is an essential part of maintaining and sustaining the organization. The purpose of this study was to determine the evaluation criteria of faculty members' performance.
Methods: The present study was conducted using qualitative content analysis method, in which 20 faculty members, specialized in educational management and evaluation and university departments managers were selected for semi-structured interviews. Sampling was purposive and snowball method. The robustness of the data was confirmed by participants and external controls. Data were analyzed using content analysis approach.
Resluts: Interview data consisted of 6 main themes and 21 sub-themes. The main themes include: research activity (3 sub-themes), educational activities (3 sub-themes), executive services (2 sub-themes), development (4 sub-themes), professional ethics (3 sub-themes) and ethics individual was (6 sub-themes).
Conclusiosn: The findings showed an in-depth understanding of faculty performance criteria in 6 main themes and 21 sub-themes. It is suggested that the findings of the present study be used to evaluate the performance of university lecturers.
 
Keywords: Performance evaluation, Faculty, Qualitative study, Content analysis.
Full-Text [PDF 295 kb]   (1870 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: health management
Received: 2020/04/5 | Accepted: 2020/04/5 | Published: 2020/04/5


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 9, Issue 3 (May- June 2020) Back to browse issues page